|
|
The 19th Edge Debate: 4th December 2003
Action Points
- Exception buildings driven by clients. Most buildings in this
country not for clients. Planning system stops innovation
- Less owner occupation, more investor-driven buildings. Need
to look at investor-building
- Driver - how to involve the users. They need to realise that
it is their pensions. Difficult to make the link.
- FTSE for good dimension - grade A building after it has a label
will be more valuable.
- Will labelling change things? You will label bad old buildings.
Then we will say what are we going to do with the worst buildings.
Some one will say let's make it better. How do we persuade ourselves
to do this? Polar bear argument misplaced. Appealing to people
to leave the ecology alone is not realistic.
- Scandinavian label buildings and police-out the poorest.
- Now there is an EC directive that looks for improvements at
point of sale; it is another question as to whether it will be
successful. Not about pointing finger at developers. End-users
have to demand the buildings they want.
- Point finger at HM Treasury. Need a fiscal incentive. Ruled
out moderated stamp duty for energy label. Missed the chance.
- Energy taxation. Presumption tax on batch transaction on units
of fuel. Not assets. Buildings are energy service structures.
Govt needs to take this on board. They are starting to do it on
cars. But still think energy tax applies only to the petrol. In
context of buildings (and other large assets) utilisation technologies.
- Also the management of what you do when you have got it. It
is about how you can avoid the waste, for instance.
- Govt as client should make a statement - tipping point for the
client. Means property developers would not be able to ignore
that part of the market.
- But evidence is the other way around - what governments do first
usually seen as naff. Bad for branding. Get best technology in
at the desirable end.
- End of Victorian infrastructure. We need a vision of how to
reconstruct this. Easy to get 90% improvement with new building
over old. Perhaps we should be replacing more?
- Point finger at ourselves. We are not living what we are preaching.
- Aren't we faced with too much choice and this choice is driven
by too much energy. Does this mean legislation is the only tipping
point?
- Don 't believe you can legislate the solution. It is about changing
tastes. Selling the sustainable to the upper echelon. Institutions
are not empowering the people who are their ultimate ….
- Some clients are different. Make a low carbon building. Here
is the best practice target. Client will use it in a more intensive
way. Planned it without building. It had the same price. Client
asked how exceptional is this - very. Able to do it because you
- client- asked the right questions. This is the simplest tipping
point.
- But the client has to know. How do people know? Public full
of emotion and not enough knowledge. Money for a campaign. - world
not given to you by your fathers but lent to you by your children.
- Problem with getting real. Designers do not know enough about
what they create.
- Fuel poverty also affects those empty nesters with large houses
- Rich poor ratios at 18. Changed by tax. We do not know what
it is for carbon consumption.
- Fuel poverty - every Internet reference to the UK. It is uniquely
an UK problem, because British-built infrastructure is so awful.
The quality is so bad in terms of energy performance. We need
to face up to demolishing some of this poor infrastructure
- We need to do something about it but not necessarily demolishing
it. 20% every year. We had better be putting money away to dealing
with this
- Free masons: amount of new convection elective heating
- Resonance: low carbon society people's desires consistent with
low carbon infrastructure - cycling on Dutch model, flat screens
- 3 drivers so far (1) fashion, (2) educate people & (3) provide
ability for some of the people to do some of these things. We
should concentrate on #3
- Fashion is much more powerful. Architecture is all about fashion.
In terms of setting expectations on the 3 options. Opportunity
will be interpreted through the social context set in (1).
- People do not believe that anything they do will have any effect.
We need to demonstrate at what sort of critical thresholds concerted
action will make a difference
- Future is not Eagle comic. Where are the visions of what it
will look like and which will appeal to children
- Food consumption: unfashionable to consume too much. Used to
say the more you gorge the richer you are: now the other way around
- example of 1, 2 & 3
- Focus efforts on the next generation. We are set in our ways
and we have a lifestyle to sustain. Sounds like do as I say not
as I do. We should be setting the example
- We have got to lead by example. Young people appear to show
the least concern. Young children are being driven more as consumers
and this increases energy consumption. Sustainability means changing
our way of life
- Part of the sustainability plan - demonstrations. Serious part
of government policy. Might appear an unattractive programme but
we need to look at it more closely
- Not got the time to leave to the children. Key point is leadership.
Mayor swapped Jag for Smart car. Leaderships at the intersection
between passion and responsibility
- If there is a tipping point it must be building new homes. Need
to see that energy-efficient homes look very different from the
sorts of homes we are building. We could change the way that the
rating system works. We have not mentioned how much it costs -
20% of windmills is to go through the planning system. We need
to build honestly and might be able to halve our building costs.
- Use the power of our purchasing decisions. We should choose
our institution membership on the basis of their performance
- In the institutional position - we should be the leaders so
that people could begin to think more for themselves. We talk
all the time, we are not getting our knowledge across in a way
that people can apply
- Hard to sell sustainability to clients
- We ought to be able to understand what we consume. Get checkout
reading of our carbon. Institutionally we should be making this
happen.
- 72% London energy used in buildings. We know how to deliver
better buildings
- But we touch 2% of buildings every year. Not a big enough change
(more with refurbishment)
- Another tipping point: global growth: Chinese + Indian economies
expected to overtake US. Europe irrelevant. What we do here will
not make much difference. Got to find ways of making the dominant
economies tip.
- Tipping point in your own mind. Been told for 3 decades we have
to cut down use of energy. But it is not energy per se it is fossil
fuels. Building industry is where we use energy. Ambient systems
not the active systems. Need to look at the entire energy system,
not just human but nature. The built system is the interface between
the two. What we do with the electricity is just fine-tuning.
We are focusing all of our measurements on just one part of the
package. Asian economies can make a big difference if they put
in the effort in getting the buildings right.
- How to get people to change. We therefore need leaders to show
the way. How can we start at home?
- 1973 energy crisis 1979 there was a threat of another. Had a
major impact on conservation impact projected on the 1980s. Fear
motivates
- Behavioural change -change in attitudes on smoking. What has
brought about this change? How can we apply this (smoking, seat
belts and drink-driving.
- People stopped smoking because of the stark images. However
not everyone smoking, more in some groups than in others
- Message needs to be second nature
- Too much bitching going on in the professions. Concerted campaign
for more ethical buildings. We need simple tools to help us to
do this. More research on the value of doing this. If we all did
this, we would be setting a better example
- Why not have professionals take part of their fees from energy
performance of buildings
- Goes back to measurement and feedback. Not just the car but
also the driver. Easier if you had a report from your fuel supplier.
Ofgem will not move on this. Consumption should be set against
what it should be and what designers expected it to be and where
you were before.
- Professional glossy press does not talk about carbon emissions.
This information needs to be foremost on any discussion of a new
building. We need to press for this
- Planning system: needs to happen at the start. Too late when
it comes to the building regulations.
- Apparently planning office targets are throughput not quality
- Only 2.7% of planning permissions are for major projects. Rest
is concerned with extensions
- Massive tipping point is Bangladeshis on 1 metre contour and
in danger of flooding
- Most people do not believe there is a problem Task for the professions
is to convince them that there is
|